Extensive Deception
HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims

Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims
  • HOA Member Notes
  • Request a Repair
  • City Permit Violations
  • Communications
  • Calendar Customer Service
  • More
    • HOA Member Notes
    • Request a Repair
    • City Permit Violations
    • Communications
    • Calendar Customer Service

Extensive Deception
HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims

Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims Extensive Deception HOA La Jolla Unit owner since 1997 Claims
  • HOA Member Notes
  • Request a Repair
  • City Permit Violations
  • Communications
  • Calendar Customer Service

HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025

HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025

UCSD Zoom Access for Herschel Condo Association are controllled by UCSD Zoom Account, Unit 1

HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025

HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025HOA Resident since 1997 Sought Elder Abuse Protection 2024-2025

UCSD Zoom Access for Herschel Condo Association are controllled by UCSD Zoom Account, Unit 1

May 30, 20205 Real Estate Fraud & Economic Crimes Case Open

 

5/30/2025: Unit 2 Claims Harsh tactics fueld by Venedetta by HOA President and owner Unit 1: Since  2/12/2020

5/16/2025 HOA Owner Notes - Again Unit 2 could not access the HOA Zoom Video Meeting: Units 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 did access


Attendees: Units 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 were physically present. Unit 2 attempted to join remotely but experienced access issues.

Meeting Minutes:

  • 5:05 PM - Unit 2 Joins Remotely: Unit 2 dialed into the meeting at 5:05 PM.

    • Unit 1: "Is that you, Ms. Punta?"
    • Unit 2: "Yes, I have been unable to access the Video Zoom like other owners for months now."
    • Unit 1: "That is not true. You must log into a Zoom account first due to the threat of Zoom Bombers."
    • Unit 2: "Why, when all other owners can simply log in?"
    • Unit 1: "You may not speak, and I am muting you until public comment."
    • Note: Unit 1 is the only HOA member controlling guest login settings. Unit 2 faces a different, more complex login process than Units 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9, requiring two extra steps due to Zoom settings that prevent her from simply clicking the link. This is perceived as selective enforcement.
    • Attendee Demographics:
      • Unit 1: Male, under 55 years old.
      • Units 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9: Female, over 55-90 years old.
  • Unit 3 (Owned since 2017): "Did we pay the Epsten loan off before we approved $5,000 more [in legal fees]?"

    • Answer: "No, we stopped making payments but are confident we will pay once we collect from Unit (2)
  • Unit 3: "How many votes are needed to amend the CCRs?"
    • Unit 1 President: Was unsure, stating "maybe 2/3 or 3/4."
    • Note: The San Diego District Attorney (SDDA) is investigating potential fraud, and Unit 1 is perceived to be urgently trying to amend the CCRs.
  • Unit 2 (Owned since 1997): Re-reported ongoing HOA Zoom accessibility issues, stating inability to attend meetings remotely for months. Unit 1 President attributed this to a new requirement for Unit 2 to use his UCSD work Zoom account due to "fear of Zoom bombers." Unit 2 reported this lack of Zoom assistance to Shay Wickline (Bookkeeper, APS), who handles all communications on behalf of the HOA President, but received no reply.

    Unit 2 highlighted the website she built for HOA transparency, a calendar, and document storage to potentially save the HOA approximately $600 per month in administrative costs. Unit 1 has allegedly refused agenda time to present how this automation could save owners up to $10,000 annually. The reasoning for this refusal is unclear.
    • Unit 2 addressed the HOA mediation regarding the $41,000 fine and subsequent foreclosure threat. This followed an incident where owners from Units 1, 6, and 7 allegedly pushed the Unit 2 owner in the garage after pre-approved plumbing work, leading to a police call, a contested fine, and denial of access to the UCSD Zoom HOA hearing with Epsten Law.
    • The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is set for June 25, 2025. Unit 2 appealed to all owners to cease the selective targeting allegedly initiated by Unit 1 since his takeover in 2020.
  • Unit 1 President: Requested Units 8 and 9 to count votes in June for proposed CCR amendments. No owner has yet seen the proposed amendments from Epsten Law. Unit 2 voiced concern about further spending with Epsten Law, given the HOA's existing arrears with the firm and the over $50,000 paid to Epsten by Unit 1 since taking over on 2/12/2020. Unit 2 alleges that repairs and maintenance are not a priority, but rather the constructive eviction of an owner in good standing.

    Unit 9: Replied that she would count the votes. Note: Unit 9 reportedly did not pay HOA dues from 1978-2010.

  • Unit 8: Stated she would return in late June and count votes with Unit 9.

  • Unit 1 President: Unit 1 sets next HOA urgently pushing loan and vote to spend $5K more with Epsten- Asked Shay Wickline APS about the speed of APS in distributing ballots and proposed an urgent vote by the end of June on unseen amendments. APS indicated a one-day turnaround for mailing. APS cautioned about potential mail delays and said "Yes Sir"

    • Notes: The HOA has reportedly not held formal elections in years. In October [year unspecified], Unit 9 allegedly counted votes alone in her unit, leading to Unit 1 being named President again, despite receiving fewer votes. Only Unit 9 was involved in the vote count inside her unit.
    • Warning: Owners reportedly do not understand the rationale behind Unit 1 President's push to change the CCRs.
    • Unit 2 Notes: Unit 2 believes the CCR changes are intended to further the goal of removing her from her home and has previously voiced concerns about Unit 1's alleged inability to manage finances, ensure timely and equitable repairs, and provide equal access to meetings.
  • Unit 2: Emailed Shay Wickline on 5/19/2025 to request agenda time for relevant issues but received no response.

Additional Context from Other Dates:

  • May 17th, 2025: The owner of Unit 4 corrected Shay Wickline (APS) in a group email, stating that the meeting notice sent on Saturday was incorrect and that the meeting notice was previously communicated as Wednesday, May 21st.
  • Saturday, May 17th, 2025: Shay Wickline (APS) emailed a meeting notice for May 19th, contradicting a previous notice for Wednesday, May 21st, 2025.
  • HOA President Meeting Notices: The HOA President posted meeting notices in the common area with only two days' notice, lacking an agenda and announcing conflicting dates (initially May 21st, then changed to May 19th).
  • City of San Diego Violations: The City of San Diego has reportedly issued multiple permit violations against Unit 7 (located above Unit 2), but the HOA has allegedly refused to address these violations.
  • Unit 2 Noise Complaint: Unit 2 sent a noise complaint to APS regarding Unit 7's alleged operation of a childcare business, causing disruptive running, slapping, and jumping noises. Unit 2 contends that recent renovations in Unit 7 have exacerbated noise transmission. The Board has allegedly refused to place Unit 2's complaints on the agenda, despite City of San Diego fine notices against Unit 7's unpermitted work dating back to 2022. The current owner of Unit 7 reportedly waived her right to complain about this issue when purchasing from Erica Derby (a licensed real estate agent), who sold the unit to the Board member in December 2023. While the current owner initially indicated willingness to make repairs after a recently issued permit sought by Erica Derby, she subsequently began operating a daycare with two infants, leading to increased noise levels (running laps up to three times daily with loud jumping).
    • The previous owner of Unit 3 reportedly sold her unit due to similar noise issues experienced when Unit 8 was rented to a family with two toddlers. The building was reportedly built as an apartment complex prior to 1979.
    • Suggestion by City of San Diego: The City recommends calling the non-emergency line (619-531-2000) while the noise is occurring. Enforcement may require the reporting party to sign a complaint if officers don't witness the noise. The City also suggests courtesy knocks, contacting the landlord (in this case, the HOA), filing a noise complaint, or attempting mediation through the National Conflict Resolution Center (619-238-2400).
    • Unit 2 seeks resolution to enjoy her unit, citing the impact of renovations in Unit 7, including the gutting of the living room, relocation of the washer/dryer to the hallway, changes to electrical outlets and wall fans, and hardscape expansion.
  • May 8th, 2025: APS mailed a hard copy notice to all owners regarding the Hydrez inspection scheduled for June 28, 2025.
  • April 2025 HOA Meeting: The HOA meeting was reportedly canceled despite a $41,000 fine levied against Unit 2. This cancellation allegedly occurred because Unit 2 reported deferred maintenance, elder abuse, and selective enforcement following a serial meeting held by Units 1, 3, 4, and 9 inside Unit 3 without the remaining five units present.
  • April 14th, 2025: Active termite evidence was reported near the back gate.
  • April 11th, 2025: Epsten Law reportedly requested Unit 2 to drop a hearing scheduled for 4/14/2025 concerning ongoing elder abuse (confirmed by SD County Elder Abuse Services). Unit 2 agreed to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), but the HOA scheduled it for late June. Findings by the County reportedly included financial abuse, but their actions were limited due to Board protections. Unit 2 was fined $41,000 in January 2025.
  • San Diego District Attorney Investigations: The SDDA has reportedly opened both a Real Estate Fraud case and an Economic Crimes case.
  • March 31st, 2025 HOA Meeting: This 15-minute meeting limited owners to 3-minute speaking times. Unit 2 was unable to access the meeting remotely and requests for access from owners present in units were allegedly ignored, leading to the meeting concluding before Unit 2 could participate. Unit 2 had reportedly been unable to access the UCSD Zoom for months. The Board members from Units 1, 6, and 7 allegedly refused to assist Unit 2 with accommodation for meeting access. Unit 1 reportedly changed his UCSD Zoom sign-in process without notifying the HOA.
  • March 31st, 2025 (Unit 3): Unit 3 reported plumbing rust dripping on her car for years and requested repairs. The Board made repairs, which Unit 3 was reportedly satisfied with (mentioned during the 5/19 HOA meeting, referencing a new car purchase).
  • Common Area Plumbing Issue (Date Unspecified): Unit 2 experienced a clogged common area plumbing line with a sink overflowing for two days. Instead of direct communication from the Board, Unit 2 allegedly received a call from a third party hired by the Unit 1 President. This individual reportedly stated that the issue was Unit 2's responsibility, despite the HOA's alleged lack of maintenance on the lines since 2016 and Unit 2's unit flooding. Unit 2 reportedly asked Unit 7 to refrain from using the kitchen sink, but Unit 7 did so, resulting in Unit 2's hardwood floors flooding overnight.
  • Unit 8 Financial Request (Date Unspecified): Unit 8 requested financial information, but Unit 1 stated it would be provided "soon." APS issued a DRAFT financial statement. There has reportedly been no audit of the HOA finances since the significant legal spending with Epsten Law began (exceeding 25% of HOA revenue). The HOA allegedly owes Epsten Law a past-due loan and intends to charge Unit 2 for speaking out about verified elder abuse, election fraud, meeting accessibility issues, and selective enforcement.
  • CCR Violations (Date Unspecified): Unit 3 allegedly has two pets despite CCRs limiting owners to one. This was reportedly concealed from the Board at the time of purchase, allowing Unit 3 to keep both pets. Unit 4 allegedly bypassed HOA CCRs in 2024 by renting her unit to tenants with a dog exceeding the weight limit without prior Board approval or a vote. The Board is now reportedly spending approximately $4,000 with Epsten Law to amend the CCRs, allegedly to accommodate Board members' selective violations. While most owners reportedly do not object to a "support dog," they are concerned about accommodations for pets while Unit 2 is allegedly denied accommodations for accessing Unit 1's UCSD Zoom for HOA meetings.
  • February 20th 2025: APS sent a meeting notice by email, which was subsequently canceled despite its urgency.
  • October 2024, a $65,000 assessment was levied for "emergency repairs" despite years of notice. 9 units must pay within 60 days

HOA Meeting 5 12 2025 (1) (pdf)Download
Notes from May 19th Herschel Condominium Association May Meeting (4) (pdf)Download
UCSD Zoom Policy _5_20_25 Snip (5) (pdf)Download
UC-IT-22-0611_ITAccessibility_Accessible (pdf)Download
IMG_4369 (PNG)Download
APSContractSigned (1) (pdf)Download
7434 Herschel - Structure Engineer report (PDF)Download

HOA Documents & Photos 2020-2025. HOA Pres Diverts HOA Repairs to Epsten Law in 2020 -2025-Urgent vote for more $5K


    HOA Was Taken Over -Illegally on 2/12/2020

    Our Mission

    We are dedicated to improving the quality of life in our community by promoting a safe, welcoming, and inclusive environment for all residents. Our goal is to foster a strong sense of community and enhance the value of our homes.

    Board of Directors

    Unit 1 hires a security guard to stalk Unit 2 for two days.See proof invoice

     Superior Court Issues a TRO

    In October 2024, a $65,000 assessment was levied for a roof that had been leaking for ten years. This, along with weeks-long stair closures due to failed maintenance and the fact that repairs were completed without permits, demonstrates a critical failure in board planning for necessary repairs and asset lifespans

     Before February 12, 2020, owners worked collaboratively to resolve complaints and managed repairs through smaller, quarterly assessments, addressing decades of deferred maintenance. Since then, a new president hired Epsten Law, and the focus has shifted from essential repairs to excessive legal spending, particularly targeting Unit 2, which reported needed common area repairs. For example, iron railings, 60% replaced in 2017, were left to deteriorate again because the board failed for years to hire a handyman. Now, these detached, rusted railings and stairs require costly repairs for only nine owners. Despite this, the board proposes spending another $5,000 with Epsten Law to amend CCRs—CCRs the board itself doesn't consistently follow. This selective targeting of Unit 2 only highlights the board's mismanagement. Epsten Law is profiting at the expense of necessary repairs. An estimated $100,000 elevator repair is also being neglected in favor of further legal expenses. We urge you to prioritize repairs over legal fees. Over 25% of our revenue, which could have funded painting and repairs to crumbling retaining walls, has been diverted to Epsten Law. The rusted door of Unit 1 and the overall neglected appearance of the HOA detract from the La Jolla aesthetic, a direct result of prioritizing legal costs over maintenance. 

    PDF Viewer

    Bylaws Budgets and Documents

    Download PDF

    HOA Does not disclose Email costs charged by APS

    The HOA fees are $563. a month and cover the cost of maintaining common areas and amenities in the community. The issue is that the HOA is not maintaining common area. In 2020 Unit 1 hired APS but owners were unaware of spending and costs. Thousands in costs exposed

     

    Reporting and Financial Issues:

    • Reporting Maintenance: Homeowners are directed to contact APS, the HOA bookkeeping service, to report maintenance issues, but are charged an undisclosed amount for reporting repairs or election fraud.
    • Plumbing Costs: The HOA lacks a fair and transparent process for handling common area plumbing maintenance. Some members are charged for repairs, while others are not, with Unit 1 unilaterally deciding financial responsibility.
    • Financial Transparency: Homeowners are denied access to HOA bills, spending records, and budgets. Record requests face delays of years, often requiring legal action.

    Board Conduct and Rule Enforcement:

    • Selective Remodeling Approval: Some owners, like Unit 9, can remodel simply by speaking with the board president, while others must submit to a full board vote.
    • Selective Enforcement and Harassment: Unit 2, which reported needed repairs, has been targeted. After Unit 2 was granted repairs, the unit above called the San Diego Police due to "plumber noise."
    • Unpermitted Work by Board Member: Unit 7, a current board member, installed electrical outlets on their patio in 2024 without permits or required votes, and then called 911 on Unit 2 for pre-approved plumbing repairs.
    • Failure to Address Building Code Violations: Units upstairs removed walls, added hardscape, and installed unpermitted electrical work, violating building codes and HOA CCRs, without board approval or permits.

    Plumbing Problems and Financial Abuse:

    • Recurring Plumbing Issues: Common area plumbing maintenance is inadequate, leading to recurring problems. For example, when a unit upstairs (occupied by a board member) has guests, the sink in Unit 2 below backs up and overflows. The HOA president has twice ordered Unit 2 to pay for clearing common area lines.
    • Unilateral Charge for Common Area Line: Unit 2 unclogged a common area line, and had to pay the expense, due to Unit 1 Board member decision.
    • Financial Abuse and Unequal Access: Financial abuse is occurring, exacerbated by the use of UCSD Zoom meetings, which some owners cannot access. Unit 1 offers in-home visits with tea to certain owners, creating unequal access to HOA matters. No in-person meetings are allowed.

    Election and Financial Irregularities:

    • Unit 9's Unpaid Dues: Unit 9 did not pay HOA monthly dues from 1978 to 2010, until an audit revealed an estimated $65,000 in unpaid dues. All other units paid. This represents an abuse of power by the current HOA president.
    • Conflict of Interest in Elections: Unit 9 counts HOA election votes for Unit 1, creating a conflict of interest. Votes need to be conducted by a third party, without unit owner involvement, to avoid conflicts of interest. Unit 1 asked a former president to count 2024 election votes, leading to the current board.
    • Exclusion of Previous President: A board seat was withheld, and the previous president was prevented from observing or serving, because she conducted audits that revealed financial abuse.

    Yes, you can rent out your property but you must notify the HOA and provide a copy of the lease agreement. 

    Built For Informational Purposes

    9 Units inside a small gated community in La Jolla CA 92037



    This website uses cookies.

    We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

    Accept